Monday, March 25, 2019
A BIG BOOST FOR THE BAD MAN
Donald Trump has lead a charmed life: Born into a wealthy family, when he was a child, his father found ways to avoid taxes and divert funds making his son a millionaire by age eight. After mysteriously avoiding the draft with a supposed bone spur, Trump entered the family business, and his father found ways to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars more to him, even as he wound up declaring bankruptcy five times. Despite his reliance on his father's money, due to his enormous ego and love of media attention, Trump was able to cultivate an image as a self made tycoon. Eventually this image led to an entire reality show built around him appearing as an almost god like figure deciding the fate of others. All while he put his name on dishonest money making con jobs, like Trump University, or subpar products like Trump Steaks. And then, somehow, he managed to win the presidency, despite his lack of experience and while running a chaotic campaign based on bigotry, lies, childish boasts, and misogyny. Not even the release of his repulsive comments about sexually assaulting women on the leaked public access tape couldn't stop him. His victory itself was a fluke, as he got just the right number of votes in the right states to win the electoral college while losing the popular vote by millions.
Which takes us to the recently released Robert Mueller report on whether or not his campaign conspired with Russia to give him an electoral advantage. For two years now progressives have been hoping that this report will deliver a knock out blow to Trump, outlining outright criminal behavior on his part. Instead, it states that no one in the Trump administration openly worked with the Russians. Somewhat amazingly, it even let Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Jr off the hook for their infamous meeting with a Russian operative in Trump tower. As an article in Slate magazine so aptly put it, "It sure looked like at least Trump Jr. and perhaps others at that meeting committed a crime. Federal law makes it a potential crime for any person to 'solicit' (that is, expressly or impliedly ask for) the contribution of 'anything of value' from a foreign citizen." Sadly, this seemingly obvious crime committed by Donald Trump's son and son in law will go unpunished.
Even though the report does not expressly say that Trump did not engage in criminal obstruction of the investigation itself, it's been mostly seen as a vindication, something that he has, of course, trumpeted to the hills. And this perception of innocence leads to a truly depressing fact: he now has a better than even chance of winning reelection. I know, I know, Trump has never had an approval rating over 50%, and there's a huge swath of Democrats ready to run against him, but the power of incumbency is very strong.
Remember that in 2004, George W Bush was running for reelection while the Iraq war that he started was crumbling into a disaster, and the economy was not doing well. Yet he not only won, he did better in 2004, than he did in the previous election, winning the popular vote after losing it in 2000. Trump will probably have more advantages than Bush did: the economy has been strong for the past three years, and while it appears that there are signs of a slow down, it probably won't turn into an outright recession. Trump's other advantage is the thing that so many many Americans have feared the most: normalization. The country has just gotten used to having a president who lies, attacks and brags constantly. Every time Trump says something that seems outrageous even by his standards, (like say, defending people at a Klan rally or attacking Senator John McCain months after his death), his approval ratings hardly ever budge. He has set the bar so low that he can't sink any lower before the election, which means nothing he says will really hurt him by then.
Oh sure, the Democratic base hate Trump just as much as the Republican base loves him, but those two groups of voters will mostly cancel each other out in 2020, leaving things up the people who always have decided presidential elections in this century: swing voters in swing states. A lot of these people are the kind of voters who mostly ignore political media coverage until right before the election, and then make their decision based on how the economy is doing and whether they feel a big need for change. While I sincerely hope that the reluctant Trump voters that put him in office will turn on him, they certainly can't be counted on.
So is Trump's victory in 2020 a lock? Of course not. Remember that there are other investigations of his potential criminal actions going on in congress, not to mention that the Democrats haven't even picked their candidate yet. A lot can happen in a year. But right now, to the deep abiding shame of this nation, Trump has the advantage.
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
OLD WHITE GUYS
With the 2020 election approaching and Donald Trump's approval rating stubbornly stuck in the fortieth percentile, there has been a veritable stampede of Democratic candidates who are eager to run against a man who's administration has been chaotic and corrupt since day one. The two top contenders right now are Senator Bernie Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden (who hasn't officially entered the race, but appears to be leaning that way). Although political issues are an important factor to Democratic voters, the ability to beat Trump is understandably their number one priority. And to many people, electibility means nominating an old white guy, like Sanders (age 77), or Biden (age 76) to match the old white guy (Trump is 72) in the White House.
Personally, I don't get this: Firstly, I do think that both Biden and Sanders are bit too old to be president. Is that ageist? I should mention that my mother, who's 79, agrees with me. The fact of the matter is that being president and making decisions that often affect the entire planet is extremely stressful. Just look at these pictures of Barack Obama at his two inaugurations in 2008 and 2012:
It's really hard to believe that that's only four years later! Even Donald Trump has complained about the difficulty of the job, and this is a president who spends most of his time watching TV, playing golf, holding rallies and ignoring cabinet meetings. Is it wrong for me to think that being leader of the free world is something that should be left to people under 70? I don't think so, I just think it's common sense (although if Biden or Sanders get the nomination, I'll certainly vote for either of them over Trump).
Part of the prevailing wisdom is that the Democrats must run a white male to attempt to lure some 2016 Trump voters over to their side. Again, I don't quite get this; white people in this country have been voting majority Republican for decades now, blatantly playing the race card with a candidate is probably not going to change that. A quick Google search reveals that Bill Clinton did not win a majority of the white vote in either of his victories. Neither did Obama, although his 44.2% of the white vote in 2008 bested both of Clinton's elections.
My point is, why should the Democrats chase after a demographic that has rejected them for years? Bill Clinton and Obama's victories show that Democrats can win with different coalitions of voters. Remember this, Hillary Clinton lost because of a number of reasons: from Trump being given enormous amounts of free media coverage right from the start, to her overblown email scandal, to Russian hacking, to Green Party candidate Jill Stein siphoning off votes, and, perhaps most importantly, James Comey's memo to congress ten days before the election. And even with all that working against her, she still got three million more votes, with Trump winning because of a crazy Electoral College bank shot accumulation of votes in just the right states.
At the end of the day, while I personally like Biden and Sanders (I particularly admire Sanders), I still think that the future of the party lies with younger candidates who can bring the same energy and appeal to younger voters that Obama did back in 2008. And I really think that someone who isn't an old white guy, like Cory Booker or Kamala Harris, can win.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)