PARTISAN HACKS

Recently the Supreme Court made a definite step in the direction of overturning the nineteen seventy three Roe Vs Wade decision when they allowed a law banning abortions after six weeks in Texas to stand.  Considering that most women do not even know that they are pregnant within six weeks of  pregnancy means that this is essentially a ban on abortions completely in the state of Texas.  The oddness of the law allows private citizens to enforce the ban, who can then collect bounties on anyone who aids a woman who gets an abortion after that six week period.  And in a particularly cruel twist, there is no exception for women who have been raped.

While this is upsetting to people like me who do not want Roe Vs Wade overturned (and we are still in the majority in this country), I can't say that I was surprised by it.  I knew way back in twenty sixteen right after Trump won that this day was coming.  As much as I disagree with them, you have to kind of hand it to the anti abortion people on the right, who have spent decades of singleminded devotion to this issue, working hard to elect Republican presidents who will put conservative judges on the court.  

Now to add insult to injury, one of the judges who voted  to uphold that law, Amy Coney Barrett, recently gave a speech defending the court, saying that they are not "partisan hacks", and that “judicial philosophies are not the same as political parties.”  This is patently absurd.  One of the things that makes this so laughable is that she made these remarks after being introduced by Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, the man who brazenly shoved her confirmation through the senate after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, just weeks before the presidential election.  And who had done the complete opposite years earlier when he blocked then President Barack Obama from filling a vacancy ten months before the election.  If Barrett really holds herself as something other than a partisan hack, she should have turned the appointment down, seeing it for what it was: a blatantly hypocritical and  partisan power grab by the Republican party, who know that their racist voter suppression laws (among others) will be upheld by a sympathetic court. 

The notion that the Supreme Court is beyond politics, even as the appointments are an inherently political process, is plain silly.  Oh sure, they can windily pontificate about "judicial philosophies" and precedents and such, but at the end of the day Republican appointed judges are expected to rule in favor of conservative causes, and vice versa for the Democrats.  And the outside political world can definitely effect rulings, which is not always a bad thing, since the legalization of gay marriage was clearly made because a changing world has come to see same sex marriage as something that should be legal.  

So, with Roe more than likely to be directly overturned sometime soon, what are progressives to do?  Sadly, there isn't much.  While there has been some talk of appointing more judges (which is called packing the court), that would be the kind of  bold and unprecedented move that Joe Biden wants no part of.  So, the only real recourse is for progressives to do what conservatives have done so well and focus on the Supreme Court (and lower courts) working hard to get out like minded voters and pushing abortion rights as an important issue.  Yes, this is a bitter pill to swallow given that Trump's three(!) Supreme Court choices will probably be ruling on our laws for decades to come, but that's the system we are stuck with. Political hack or not, Barrett isn't going anywhere.

AMERICA THE STUPID?

 Calling someone who disagrees with you politically "stupid" is an easy trap to fall in for both sides of the political fence.  As a progressive, I try to choose my words carefully, realizing that lapsing into childish name calling doesn't change any minds or do any good.  After all, there are smart people on both sides.

And yet, what is happening in red state America right now appears to be, well, downright stupid.  In the past few months, four different right wing talk show hosts who ridiculed vaccines have died from Covid-19.  While I feel sad for their friends and family, it is hard to mourn someone who so clearly had a way to avoid death and openly, proudly, chose to ignore it.  And the fact that all of these men had a media influence that they used to promote dangerous lies about vaccinations, which has surely led to the loss of other lives, makes them even less sympathetic.  And yes, stupid.

And the stupidity continues: right now in red states there has been a rash of people taking the drug Ivermectin in a misguided belief that it can effectively defeat the covid virus.  There is not one study that shows  this to be the case, but because the drug has been mentioned positively by right wing Fox News hosts like Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, their followers  have started taking the drug, which is normally used for deworming horses.  It's gotten so bad that the drug has run out in some places, with prescriptions numbering in the thousands and calls to poison control centers from people who have taken the drug skyrocketing.  There's a word for people who reject a vaccination that is the product of months of intensive research and testing, and which has been fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration, to instead take a  horse dewormer because their science denying heroes have recommended it.  That word is stupid.

And then there's the school board meetings.  Somehow, the common sense precaution of having children who are too young to get vaccinated wear masks at school has become a political issue.  Board meetings to discuss the matter have often degenerated into screaming matches and death threats.  As someone who has worn a mask quite a bit in the past year myself, I can't possibly see how something as simple as a cloth face covering has become an object of such anger.  I've never seen anyone get angry about  restaurants that enforces a "no shirt, no shoes, no service" policy.  Because that would be stupid.  

The American stupid response to the pandemic is utterly depressing when contrasted with the rest of the world: the official statistics show that in raw numbers the US leads the world in Covid cases by millions, and in deaths by tens of thousands.  Even when adjusted to a per capita basis, the country does poorly.  Even worse, our rate of fully vaccinated people lags behind nearly every other first world country, and the number of people getting vaccinated daily has lately been stuck at only around a million, a far cry from the over three million per day rate that occurred back in April.  And according to a July Forbes poll, around forty percent of Republicans plan to never get vaccinated, needlessly prolonging the pandemic because they are too stubborn to do the right thing to protect themselves and others around them.  Stubborn and stupid.  

This is certainly not the first time that conservatives in this country have believed in a stupid thing: during the presidency of Barack Obama, large numbers of Republicans doubted his birthplace.  A majority of Republicans currently believe that Donald Trump won the twenty twenty election.  But these beliefs are mostly harmless ones that are more about a desired belief than a strongly held one.  Vaccine denial is entirely different and deadly.  As America weathers our fourth wave of the virus, with hospitals overflowing and death counts rising, it's hard not to get angry at the proudly unvaccinated people that are still spreading the virus.  The proudly unvaccinated and stupid. 

THE END OF THE TWENTY YEAR WAR

 Well, it's been a mess but it's finally over.  The last American troops have withdrawn from the country of Afghanistan, bringing the longest war in American history to a close.

Given the chaotic pullout, and the tragic death of scores of people (including thirteen members of the American military) in a suicide bombing just a few days ago, many political pundits are wondering if the American public will blame President Joe Biden for what's been going on.  Today he made another direct address to the world asserting that he has done the right thing, despite the difficulties that have arisen.  Interestingly, his approval ratings have taken a hit even as most Americans still support the withdrawal.  But then, that's where I am; I think after twenty years and two trillion dollars, it was time to end the war, but I also think that that ending certainly could have been handled better by the Biden administration.  Obviously he was wrong when he asserted that the American trained Afghani army wouldn't be overrun by the Taliban.  He was also wrong about not evacuating Afghan refugees earlier when he had the opportunity.

So Joe Biden deserves some blame for the violence in Afghanistan.  But then Donald Trump also deserves some blame for negotiating a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban that released thousands of Taliban soldiers and mandated no Taliban attacks on American soldiers while saying nothing about preventing ones on the Afghan military, allowing the Taliban to say they were following the agreement while overwhelming the Afghan military.  And Barack Obama also deserves some blame for having a surge of American troops enter Afghanistan back in two thousand and nine, which did nothing to quell the violence.  And of course, George W Bush must take some blame (most of the blame in my opinion) for getting us into the mess of Afghanistan in the first place.  As the New York Times recently reported, the Taliban were ready to negotiate an American withdrawal as early as two thousand and one, but Bush refused them.  So, just like the mess of Viet Nam could be blamed on both Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, the mostly disastrous Afghan war that has endured through four presidencies can be blamed on all four presidents.  (And both political parties for that matter!).

Honestly, my cynical nature about the American public makes me think that most Americans will stop even thinking of Afghanistan much now that all the American troops are home.  Although there may be a few stories about the Taliban's mistreatment of women and the refugees arriving in the coming months, I imagine that in about a year or so our longest war will already be forgotten by most of the public, and things like the economy and covid will be given much higher priority.

If there's one good thing that can come out of what has happened in Afghanistan, it this: hopefully, the country will realize that, even though we have the biggest military in the world, invading and occupying hostile foreign countries is not something that can be done lightly.   The last successful American war was way back in nineteen ninety one when America attacked Iraq,  drove their forces out of Kuwait, but decided not to completely force Saddam Hussein out of power.  However you may have felt about that war, it was done quickly with a clear mission, something that our last two messes in Iraq and Afghanistan have never had.

THE MESS IN AFGHANISTAN

   "I was the fourth President to preside over an American troop presence in Afghanistan-two Republican, two Democrats.  I would not, and will not, pass this war onto a fifth."-President Joe Biden

The longest running war in American history has come to a tragic, and sadly fitting end.  Fulfilling a promise that he made on the campaign trail, (and one that was supported by a large majority of the country), President Joe Biden has pulled American troops out of  Afghanistan.  By doing so he held to a withdrawal bargain that the Donald Trump administration negotiated with the Taliban fighters of Afghanistan before he left office.  The  result has been an overwhelming show of force of the Taliban, who have taken over all the country's major cities in a surprisingly short period of time, as the American trained Afghan soldiers fell or fled without American support.  Over the years our country has spent tens of billions of dollars trying to train an independent Afghan army, and yet the Taliban was able to topple them in a matter of days, a powerful example of what a difficult conflict this has been.

The whole situation with Afghanistan has always been a complicated one: I still remember how after the terrorist attacks of 9/11 the country was filled with understandable anger and rage.  Surely, striking back at the people who organized the attack made sense, and their headquarters were in Afghanistan.  But once the invasion was made and the Al Queda organization there was smashed, how much obligation did the US have to stay and try to stabilize the country? The goals of the war were met within a few years, with the war becoming more of a violent occupation than an outright war, one with no easy endpoint.

  The first president to deal with Afghanistan, George W Bush, seemed to lose interest in it when he prioritized the invasion of Iraq in two thousand and three.  Barack Obama, on the other hand, ran on ending the war in Iraq, and he did.  But he doubled down on the conflict in Afghanistan, surging in thousands of more American troops in two thousand and nine, along with trying to train and build both a native army and the country's infrastructure.  His intentions were good, but the results were mostly more failure, with much of the money intended for infrastructure building being lost because  the country's centralized government was weak and corrupt.  The continuing difficulties of the war  led Trump to run on a campaign of withdrawal, which Biden has continued.

It should be noted that not all of the effects of the American invasion of Afghanistan have been bad: the New York Times recently noted that in the twenty years of the war, the infant mortality rate has been cut in half, and far more of the Afghani people have access to electricity.  And of course, things have gotten better for the women of the country, with girls being allowed to go to school and adult women being allowed into the workforce on a wide scale for the first time.  So far, the Taliban has pledged that they will not force girls out of schools and women out of their jobs in their new regime, but the history of the Taliban does not bode well for the Afghani women. 

 Although I essentially agree with the withdrawal of American troops, the handling of it has been a chaotic mess, with the Taliban retaking power far faster than the Biden administration expected, leading to a horrifying refugee situation that's led to terrible images of desperate people clinging on to departing helicopters (a grim reminder of a similar situation that happened at the end of the Viet Nam war).  The best thing the country can do is help as many refugees as possible relocate here in the US or in other countries.  The Republican party will scream over an influx of Muslim immigrants, but it's the least we can do for all the people who allied with our country in this decades long war. 

THE BIDEN BUDGET BLUEPRINT AND A CONSERVATIVE CONTRADICTION

Way back in nineteen seventy one, congress passed the Comprehensive Child Development Bill, which would have created a public childcare program for all American parents.  Sadly, a program  that would have been a great benefit to poor and working class households was vetoed by President Nixon.  The reason he gave was that he didn't want  a "communal approach to child-rearing."  He also added that it would have "family-weakening implications."

Last February, Utah Senator Mitt Romney proposed a universal monthly payment of three hundred and fifty dollars per child to families with children.  His proposal went nowhere, as members of his own party attacked the idea, calling it  “welfare assistance”.

 Recently Democrats in congress unveiled a three and half trillion dollar spending bill that would, if passed, be the biggest social spending plan since Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs of the nineteen sixties.  Along with trying to fight climate change, a significant portion of the bill is reserved for spending on a national childcare program plus a generous paid leave program for new parents.  The bill will have to pass through reconciliation in the Senate, which means that it will probably have to undergo some cuts before all the Democratic Senators will support it.  The support of all the Democrats is necessary because the Republican party will inevitably unanimously vote against it. 

Equally relevant is the fact that recent population studies have found that Americans are having fewer and fewer children in the past few years.  While there are a number of reasons that American fertility rates are down, from better sex education, more birth control choices and more women wanting to focus on their careers, one of the main reasons is that having children in America is expensive.  And it's an expense that Republicans (except for Romney)  have done nothing to relieve in years.  Yes, the party that wraps itself in family values refuses to do anything to help poor and working class families and those families have responded by having less children.

I find it amusing that some conservatives have responded to the country's lowering birth rate with alarm, failing to see that it's the inevitable result of their anti-family policies.  Just take a look at our lack of paid national maternity leave: the US is one of the few countries in the world to not have any national maternity program.  Instead, we allow twelve weeks of unpaid leave for women who work at companies with more than fifty people, and no mandatory leave at all for women who work at companies with less than fifty workers.  Oh sure, women who work at high paying jobs often get paid leave, but women in poor or low paying jobs have little or no choice but to go back to work just a short time after giving birth.  So it's no surprise that so many women are saying no to motherhood or having less children.

Why do conservatives fail to understand this contradiction?  Part of it may be that they're still stuck in the fifties mentality that dictates that the most successful families are ones in which dad goes to work and mom stays home with the kids.  The fact that the country's growing income gap and stagnant wages for the middle class means that many families can't even afford to live this way anymore doesn't seem to enter into their thinking.

A more cynical reason is that conservative politicians oppose these programs because the wealthy corporations that pay for their campaigns don't want them to exist.  And, as long as the Republican party is able to convince middle class white voters to support them while doing nothing to help the middle class, they can just keep right on doing nothing to make child rearing a little less expensive for our families.  They just shouldn't be so surprised when those families respond by having fewer or no children.

ANDREW CUOMO AND REPUBLICAN HYPOCRISY

During the pandemic, New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo became a media darling as he tried to handle being the governor of a state that was the epicenter of the pandemic.  For a while there the tough talking New Yorker was poised to become the next Rudy Giuliani, and even a presidential run didn't seem out of the question.  What a difference a few months can make.

When the first sexuall assault charges were made against Cuomo, his denials seemed somewhat reasonable.  Perhaps he was just an overly affectionate guy from a different era when it was alright for a boss to be so.  But now that a through investigation has been made, it's clear that the man went beyond mere friendly affection.  Eleven different women detail stories of him making creepy comments and groping them, and there is one clear case that he retaliated against one of the women after she spoke out about it.  Add to that reports that he openly lied about his success battling covid, and it's easy to see why President Joe Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have both called for him to resign.

Right now the governor is fighting back, releasing an odd video in which he defended himself by showing pictures of him being publicly affectionate with other people in the past, as if that explains the behavior that many of these women claimed happened in private.  To me, there's no question that he should step down, both for the good of the state and his political party.  But it is possible that he could successfully hang on to office and finish his term.  In other words, he could pull a Donald Trump.

In October of twenty sixteen, which seems like a lifetime ago, the infamous Access Hollywood tape hit the Trump presidential campaign like a ton of bricks.  Along with the tape, twenty five different women claimed that he had sexaully assaulted them in the exact manner that he had bragged about on the tape.  It's so hard to believe now just how finished Trump's political career looked, as numerous Republican party members withdrew their endorsements of him and Vice Presidential candidate Mike Pence considered dropping off the ticket.  Trump, like Cuomo, just plowed onward, dismissing the words he spoke on the tape as "locker room talk" and shrugging off all  the sexual assault charges, claiming that he would eventually sue all the women making them (something he still hasn't gotten around to doing). 

It appears that Cuomo, just like Trump, seems to think that blanket denials will work for him.  But the Democratic party is not like the Republican party in that they do not just worship power.  Even if Cuomo does stay in office, his career as a Democratic leader or spokesperson is over; I can't imagine that the party will ever embrace him again.  This stands in sharp contrast to Trump, who's time as a pariah in the Republican party only lasted until election day.  Once he somehow eked out a victory, everything was forgiven, and some of his biggest critics, like Senators Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz, became some of his most toadying lackeys.   Things like yet another woman coming forward to say that Trump once raped her in a dressing room were completely ignored, as absolute loyalty to him became the standard for nearly every member of the party.

It seems hard to believe that the same Republican party that once forced Senator Bob Packwood to resign because of sexaul assualt charges back in nineteen ninety five could now continue to support Trump even as he is out of office, but those are the depths that the Republican has sank to ever since they turned a TV celebrity into a demagogic cult leader.   No, the Democratic party isn't perfect, but they certainly hold the higher moral ground when it comes to punishing deplorable behavior from a party leader. 

THE UNVACCINATED

"99.5% of deaths are among the unvaccinated." US Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy on recent coronavirus deaths.

The anti vaccine myth first took hold in the world back in nineteen ninety eight when former British surgeon Andrew Wakefield published a poorly researched study claiming that there was a link between certain vaccinations and autism in the medical paper The Lancet.  Although the article was later retracted by that paper, the damage was done; propped up by celebrities like Jenny McCarthy, lies about one of the greatest scientific advances in the history of the world were spread all over the media.  The one good piece of news is the anti vaccine belief never hit the mainstream in the US, with it mostly staying on the fringes of society.  

Sadly, the same cannot be said about the anti vaccine movement that has arisen during the covid crisis.  Recently, the European Union exceeded America in the percentage of its people being vaccinated, and with recent polls showing a whopping forty seven percent of Republicans saying that they do not plan to get the vaccine, these depressing trends appear to be ready to continue.  The reasons people give for not getting vaccinated range from reasonable sounding (the vaccines are too new) to insane (magnetism!).  It is truly upsetting to consider that while other countries are begging for more vaccinations, many parts of America are running a surplus!

So why are so many Americans turning away from a vaccine that  has been used on  billions of people around the world, even as a more contagious strain of the virus is spreading around the nation? It appears to be a unique brand of American stubbornness, combined with anti intellectualism.  Now while there is some distrust of the vaccine in African American communities (who's basis for distrust of the government regarding health has historical precedent) it is mostly in politically conservative, mostly white communities that the anti vaccine attitudes run the strongest.  Most of this is due to the downplaying of the virus that the Donald Trump administration did almost from the beginning of the pandemic: from him calling the coronavirus a "liberal hoax" to his claims that it will disappear when the weather gets warmer, Trump shrugged off the threat for a long time before finally starting to care when it kept getting worse.  Even then, he seemed to support anti mask protests going on in places like Michigan.  And, taking their cues from the president, the right wing media fell in line with him, shrugging off the virus for far too long  even as cases soared.

To be fair, both Trump and the right wing media have equivocated on this issue: Trump got the vaccine himself, but allowed no photography of the moment and defends people who don't want to get it.  Conservative commentator Sean Hannity spoke out for vaccines, before just seconds later when he condemned universities that have vaccination requirements.  Obviously, coming after months of misleading covid statements coming from both the former president and Fox News, this is all a little too little and a little too late. 

While Joe Biden has admirably tried to encourage people to get the shot, the sad fact of the matter is that the more he talks about it, the more conservatives are digging in, just to defy him. To them risking their own lives and the lives of people around them means less than admitting that they're wrong.   (Anyone who's ever argued with a Trump supporter knows how hard it can be to change someone's mind).  And everything from offering free marijuana to lottery tickets hasn't moved the needle enough. Right now Biden is considering requiring all civilian federal employees to either be vaccinated or regularly tested, and I absolutely think that that is the right thing to do.  And I hope that private businesses and universities join in on vaccine mandates.  Sure, the right wing media will howl, and there will be protests (a similar decision made by the French government was recently protested) I still think it's the right thing to do (the decision in France  also led to a big increase in people getting vaccinated).  We need to show the unvaccinated that life will be much harder for them until they finally give in and just get the same shot that hundreds of millions of other Americans have already gotten.  Putting it simply, some people's desire to "own the libs" is not more important than a return to normalcy.